The Coach's Critical Error? Taking On Wilcox and an Infallible Leadership Class

Iturns out Ruben Amorim endured defeat by Grimsby. Survive an important continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been easy, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation & Philosophy

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

Sir Jim Ratcliffe reportedly proposed using the winger at right wing-back.
The club's co-owner has allegedly suggested utilizing the attacker at right wing-back. Photograph: Getty Images

An Ultimate Power In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears similar to an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys established? What number of large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not really responsible for the food, yet finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the system coach and then dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and later bin him for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.

Stephanie Lewis
Stephanie Lewis

Elara Vance is a Toronto-based journalist and cultural critic with a passion for exploring the intersection of politics and everyday life in Canada.